You know a “funny” thing..
– I don’t think any of us will laugh at this joke.
 
I did my research. I spent thousands of hours and collected a huge data base in the begining of the year.. and was amazed about how people failed to do the same. On the 1st of April 2020 I called the C0Vert-1984 operations out for what it was: a sick April fools “Game” ..joke..
 
This summer I spoke with a person high up in the echelon of the medical.. “care” in Finland and I asked her frankly about the PCR test and that my conclusions were:
it’s like rolling a dice – a completely unreliable test 🎲
 
She confirmed it: The PCR test is a completely unreliable test.
Obviously she never became a whistle blower and it’s pretty obvious that Finland is one of the most “legally” corrupted countries in the world. Just like New Zealand. You serve.
 
..or you get excluded: WATCH this video: 
Cancelling ‘Cancel Culture’: The rise and fall of the ‘wokerati’ [ on YouTube ]
 
🧻💉

In light of our re-examination of the test protocol to identify SARS-CoV-2 described in the Corman-Drosten paper we have identified concerning errors and inherent fallacies which render the SARS-CoV-2 PCR test useless.
CONCLUSION

The decision as to which test protocols are published and made widely available lies squarely in the hands of Eurosurveillance. A decision to recognise the errors apparent in the Corman-Drosten paper has the benefit to greatly minimise human cost and suffering going forward.

Is it not in the best interest of Eurosurveillance to retract this paper? Our conclusion is clear. In the face of all the tremendous PCR-protocol design flaws and errors described here, we conclude: There is not much of a choice left in the framework of scientific integrity and responsibility.

Review report Corman-Drosten et al. Eurosurveillance 2020

Leave a Reply